Discovery, systems map, and a written plan — billed as a project before anyone writes automation.
01 — Free AI audit for SMBs
Specialist studios bill about $1,500 for a structured look at support, follow-ups, scheduling, and admin — then a written plan. Dtechkrew runs that audit for qualified SMBs in the US, UK, Europe, and Australia at no charge. Share a few details. We begin.
No 40-question form. No obligation to build. Written findings in about five business days.
Discovery, systems map, and a written plan — billed as a project before anyone writes automation.
Same work. No invoice. If we are not the right studio, we say so. You still keep what we wrote.
02 — The offer
Most “free AI assessments” are a form that recommends the product the vendor already sells. That is lead capture with a PDF on the end. A real audit is different: someone who has shipped support and admin automation sits with how your company actually runs, then writes what to stop paying people to copy-paste.
The $1,500 figure is not a coupon code. It is what a specialist studio typically charges an SMB for discovery of this depth — mapping the inbox, the CRM, the booking tool, the sheets, and the handoffs — before a statement of work. We still do that work. We do not bill it, because the audit is how we decide whether there is a first automation worth building together.
You will not get a generic “adopt generative AI” memo. You will get a ranked view of where hours go, what is patterned enough to automate, and what should stay human. If the honest answer is “fix the website” or “hire one coordinator,” that is the answer. Covering everything in the operation does not mean asking you for everything up front.
How work should move after the map — not another chat box on the site.
03 — Fit
English-speaking SMBs in the US, UK, Europe, and Australia. We decline fast when the fit is wrong so nobody wastes a week.
If that is you, the audit is useful even if we never write production code. It is a cost conversation first: which loops burn payroll, which miss revenue after 6pm, and which are not worth touching this quarter. Clinics, retail, agencies, logistics, professional services, and multi-location local services are the companies we see this pattern in most often.
04 — What we inspect
We cover the loops that actually cost SMBs money. You do not have to document them in advance. We pull the picture from a short intake and, if needed, one conversation.
Email, WhatsApp, chat, and voicemail. What still needs a person every time, what is copy-paste, and what is already answered in a doc nobody searches.
The minutes after a form, a missed call, or a quote. Speed-to-lead, the second touch, and the work that dies in a spreadsheet after 6pm.
Reminders, no-shows, reschedules, and the front-desk loop that exists because the calendar and the customer never meet.
Invoices, intake forms, proposals, meeting notes, and the staff who retype the same fields between three systems.
Sales to delivery, clinic to billing, warehouse to customer. Where context falls on the floor and someone spends the afternoon reconstructing it.
Nights, weekends, public holidays in your market. What you miss, what you overstaff, and what a system could close without a new hire.
CRM, helpdesk, sheets, Slack, WhatsApp, the booking widget. Licenses you already pay for versus a new platform someone is trying to sell you.
The answers that live in one senior’s head. How often the team asks the same question. What should be a playbook instead of a meeting.
Covering everything means we look across those lenses so the first recommendation is not “the shiny tool.” It does not mean we interview every employee or crawl every mailbox. Pattern first: what repeats, what waits, what already has an answer in a document. Depth comes from the map, not from making you fill out our homework.
Usually $1,500. Yours is $0. Three fields to start.
05 — Why guessing is expensive
SMBs do not usually fail at AI because the models are weak. They fail because they automate the wrong loop, buy a platform that needs a full-time owner, or drop a chat widget on a site that still cannot take the order. The invoice for the tool is visible. The months of staff time around a bad fit are not.
A $1,500 audit exists in the market because that mapping takes real hours: sitting with the inbox, the CRM, the calendar, and the handoff that nobody wrote down. Skipping it to “just start” is how you end up with three pilots and the same overtime. The free version here is the same discipline — so the first build, if there is one, has a job.
A full-time inbox hire in the US, UK, or Australia is a five-figure annual decision before benefits. Most of that seat is repetition: status, FAQs, “did you get this?” If 60–80% of volume is patterned, you are paying a salary for a loop.
Leads that wait overnight compete with whoever replied in ten minutes. The cost is not the CRM. It is the quote that never went out and the owner who still does first-response at 9pm.
Missed appointments, incomplete intake, and jobs that start late because paperwork was not ready. That is not a “we need AI ” problem until you count the hours on the calendar.
Staff as the integration layer: copy from email, paste into the sheet, ping on WhatsApp. Every extra tool without a handoff is overtime you never budgeted.
06 — How we work
We ask less because we already know which questions matter. The studio does the mapping.
You send name, email, and company. We confirm fit. If we need one clarifying call, it is 20–30 minutes — not a workshop.
We trace how a request actually moves: who touches it, which tools, where it waits. We score loops by hours and by how patterned they are.
A ranked list of leaks, three automation candidates with expected effort, and a clear build / wait / hire recommendation.
Optional. We talk through the brief on your hours. You keep the document either way. Next work is a separate decision.
07 — What you walk away with
Everything below is included in the $0 audit. It is the same artefact we would produce if this were a paid discovery.
How work actually flows today — not an org chart. Inboxes, tools, owners, and the waits between them.
The loops that burn payroll or miss revenue, ordered so you are not automating the wrong thing first.
Concrete first moves: what to wire, what it replaces, and whether it belongs in tools you already have.
An honest recommendation. Sometimes the answer is a person, a website, or nothing this quarter.
If there is a first build, you get a cost and time range — not a 40-slide deck and a surprise SOW.
The brief is yours. No lock-in. Use it with us, with your team, or with another studio.
Usually $1,500. Yours is $0. Three fields to start.
08 — Typical findings
Composite patterns from the kinds of companies we audit. Not invented case studies, not guaranteed savings.
Reminders, FAQs, and incomplete intake still land on one person. The audit usually finds a reminder loop and a documented FAQ that can run after hours before anyone talks about a “patient AI.”
“Where is my order?” and returns policy live in a helpdesk that a junior still types by hand. First win is status and policy, wired to the store — not a new agent platform.
Intake, status updates, and first-draft notes keep partners in the evening. The brief often ranks a structured intake and a follow-up sequence above any public chatbot.
Dispatch knows; the customer does not. Updates from the road, document capture, and a single status message cut the “any update?” thread that fills the office phone.
09 — Timing and hours
Once intake is complete, most audits are returned within five business days. Multi-location or heavily regulated operations can take longer; we will say so up front rather than pad a date. The walkthrough, if you want one, is booked on US, UK, EU, or Australian hours — not a 12-hour delay and a project manager in the middle.
English is the working language. The studio is in Lahore; the brief is written for operators in your market. If we need a clarifying call, it is short. If we can finish from the form, we do. That is what “ask less” means in practice: we do not outsource discovery to a questionnaire.
Usually $1,500. Yours is $0. Three fields to start.
10 — Why we give it away
We are a product studio, not a lead-magnet farm. The audit is free so we only take work we can stand behind: a first automation with a measurable job, or a clear “not yet.” Paid discovery exists so consultants get paid to think. We get paid when we ship. Giving the thinking away is how we keep the pipeline honest.
There is no retainer trap, no “audit credit” that expires, and no obligation to continue. If the brief says the ROI is weak, you should not hire us — and we should not sell you a chatbot to save the conversation. The $1,500 you are not paying is the price of finding that out before anyone writes production code.
Share your details. We begin. If the fit is wrong, you hear that quickly. If the fit is right, you already have the map.
11 — Guardrails
A professional audit is useful only if you can trust the room. These are the defaults.
We start from how the work moves. Credentials, if a build needs them later, live in accounts you own.
If the walkthrough is sensitive, we sign first. The audit is still free. Confidentiality is not an upsell.
The map and recommendations are yours to keep. We do not hold findings hostage behind a retainer.
We will not invent savings percentages for your board. Ranges are labelled as ranges. Reviews on this site are from real clients of the studio.
12 — Compared
Usually $1,500. Yours is $0. Three fields to start.
13 — Client reviews
5.0 average across 44 reviews.
“The work submitted was excellent and beyond what I expected in delivery. It was detailed and well documented. Response time was very quick and communication professional and productive throughout. I felt in very good hands professionally and I will definitely order again!”
“I love working with Dilshad every time! He is a very knowledgeable professional with great attention to details!”
“Raza delivered outstanding work on a complex fraud analysis project. His data science expertise was evident from the start, and he quickly understood the scope, asked smart clarifying questions, and produced high-quality, actionable results. He communicated consistently and explained his methodology clearly.”
“He is the best!!! He pays attention to details.”
“Really clearly worked with me on the issue and produced great results!”
“Great work thank you”
“He is amazing”
“Absolutely phenomenal experience from start to finish! I came in with just a vague idea of what I wanted, and they turned it into something beyond what I imagined. The communication was fast, friendly, and super clear throughout. Every revision I asked for was handled quickly and with total professionalism.”
“Absolutely fantastic experience working with Dilshad! I needed help with a Python project and they delivered exactly what I was looking for—clean, well-documented code, fast turnaround, and clear communication throughout. They really understood the requirements and even went above and beyond to optimize.”
“Great attention to detail and always communicative”
“Great experience with a very professional and intelligent person.”
“Appreciate it”
“The delivery was of high quality. Actually I was sceptical from start for different reasons, but Dilshad proved himself. Really well done!”
“Great work from Dilshad, met all requirements and deadline”
“Even though the task was to improve performance, the task was very professionally done, several experiments to show and identify the possible problems with the data, so excellent job”
“Dilshad was very knowledgeable with the given task and also easy to work with. Highly recommended!”
“Working with Dilshad Raza was a great experience! His professionalism and keen attention to details truly stood out in the project. Moreover, his quick responsiveness and deep understanding of data analytics made the collaboration seamless and efficient. Highly recommended!”
“Great experience and will definitely recommend!”
“Good work. I appreciate the quality and urgent delivery. Thanks”
“Good work. He’s a true saviour. Needed the work done urgently and he came through exceptionally. No doubt highly recommended”
“Good service. He provided excellent service. Appreciate the man.”
“Exceptional service. Delivered more than expected. Detailed work.”
“Always a pleasure working with Dilshad! He has deep professional understanding of the field and it shows in the work he delivers.”
“Dilshad delivered the project ahead of time, and provided proactive continued support.”
“Dilshad is easy to work with and provides excellent communication and attention to detail. I asked him to design a logo based on an AI generated template and he created 7 variations which was more than I requested and I ended up liking his last variation the most. Great work!”
“He followed all my criteria to a tee. He went above and beyond to develop my apps and did it within a very short time frame. I couldn’t recommend him more, Dilshad is a very talented individual.”
“Dilshad was the sweetest, so polite and respectful. I learned so much! Thank you Dilshad!”
“The best”
“Dilshad Raza was exceptional in problem solving when it comes to AI models. His professionalism and creativity ensured perfection in the projects we worked on. Working with him was a breeze — he delivered quickly, responded promptly, and truly went above and beyond to meet all expectations.”
“I would work with him again given the opportunity. My project was completed ahead of time with all the detail and quality findings I could have hoped for.”
“Exceptional work. Really did beyond expectations and it was some great quality work. Definitely worth the money. He was always available to help and solve any queries or provide any explanations and revise the work if needed. Would definitely come back again for the services. Thank you”
“Great job done, happy”
“Amazing work. Has a good understanding of the topic he is working in. Really cooperative and polite. Work was really exceptional and professional level of work done. Responded very quickly and helped a lot. Explained everything very professionally. Great communication. Keep up the good work.”
“Nice work and professional”
“Dilshad perfectly understood my needs and was able to advise on the best way to achieve my project. Would 100% recommend!”
“Very good analysis, thank you!”
“I really felt like someone was working with me side by side to complete this task.”
“Great person, helped me get started with data science”
“Always communicate with the most detail-oriented manners and guidance well-followed to the project. Definitely recommend for great work and exceptional outcome!”
“Impressive work. Will use again.”
“Great experience. Working with him was awesome.”
“Best service in data science. Recommended”
“Good work. Recommended”
“Good work. He provides detailed work as required. Recommended for data science expertise.”
14 — FAQ
15 — Begin the audit
Three fields to start. No 40-question form. We will follow up on your hours if we need a clearer picture of where the work goes.